http://nppr.se/2010/04/07/contra-bonos-mores-and-the-sex-purchase-ban-in-norway/ A comparative study of prostitution policy reform in the Nordic countries Sun, 11 Sep 2011 20:15:24 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.3 http://nppr.se/2010/04/07/contra-bonos-mores-and-the-sex-purchase-ban-in-norway/comment-page-1/#comment-298 Johan Karlsson Schaffer Thu, 13 May 2010 09:32:24 +0000 http://nppr.se/?p=444#comment-298 Thanks for pointing that out, Johanna. I've changed the post title. Thanks for pointing that out, Johanna. I’ve changed the post title.

]]> http://nppr.se/2010/04/07/contra-bonos-mores-and-the-sex-purchase-ban-in-norway/comment-page-1/#comment-297 Johanna Sirkiä Thu, 13 May 2010 08:01:32 +0000 http://nppr.se/?p=444#comment-297 About your Latin: “bonos mores” is plural accusativus. Accusativus is used for example if there is preposition “contra” like in phrase “contra bonos mores”. In your title you should use nominativus instead. Your title should be: Boni mores and the sex purchase ban in Norway. For more details please study Latin grammar. About your Latin: “bonos mores” is plural accusativus. Accusativus is used for example if there is preposition “contra” like in phrase “contra bonos mores”. In your title you should use nominativus instead. Your title should be: Boni mores and the sex purchase ban in Norway. For more details please study Latin grammar.

]]> http://nppr.se/2010/04/07/contra-bonos-mores-and-the-sex-purchase-ban-in-norway/comment-page-1/#comment-241 christina sarginson Wed, 07 Apr 2010 10:19:55 +0000 http://nppr.se/?p=444#comment-241 This was very interesting to read on many different levels. Firstly it suggests that prostitution is not wanted by society, well I am not sure this is entirely true. If it was not wanted there would be no need to have a law against it. Secondly I think women who sell sex do deserve to be treated as anyone else and not as lower beings. They do provide a service to society and although not everyone would choose this profession it has been around for thousands of years and passing a law will not get rid of it, it will just go underground and become more dangerous. Thirdly carrying out this work does not mean that the individual purchasing sex has any rights to beat or attack a prostitute, as long as the terms of the contract is carried out they should walk away. What do others think? This was very interesting to read on many different levels. Firstly it suggests that prostitution is not wanted by society, well I am not sure this is entirely true. If it was not wanted there would be no need to have a law against it. Secondly I think women who sell sex do deserve to be treated as anyone else and not as lower beings. They do provide a service to society and although not everyone would choose this profession it has been around for thousands of years and passing a law will not get rid of it, it will just go underground and become more dangerous. Thirdly carrying out this work does not mean that the individual purchasing sex has any rights to beat or attack a prostitute, as long as the terms of the contract is carried out they should walk away. What do others think?

]]>